????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? 1
Full Metadata
| Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Nopadol Nimsuwan | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Thitiwan Saisuwan | - |
| dc.contributor.department | ?????????????? | - |
| dc.contributor.department | Faculty of Education | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-16 22:06 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-11T02:43:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-05-16 22:06 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.description | ????????,?????????????????,2568 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | ABSTRACTThis research aimed to study: 1) the level of creative leadership among school administrators under the Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office I, 2) the level of teachers� work motivation, 3) the relationship between creative leadership of administrators and teachers� work motivation, and 4) the predictive variables of creative leadership that influence teachers� work motivation. The sample consisted of 103 schools under the Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office I in the academic year 2024. The research instrument was a five-point Likert scale questionnaire divided into three parts: Part 1 � a checklist questionnaire for respondents� demographics; Part 2 �a questionnaire on creative leadership, with a reliability coefficient of .905; and Part 3 � a questionnaire on work motivation, with a reliability coefficient of .902. The overall reliability coefficient was .904. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson�s correlation coefficient, and enter-method multiple regression analysis.The findings revealed that: 1) school administrators demonstrated a high level of creative leadership both overall and in each aspect; 2) teachers� work motivation was also at a high level overall and in each aspect; 3) there was a moderate positive correlation (r=.534) between creative leadership and teachers� work motivation, which was statistically significant at the .01 level; and 4) the predictive variables of creative leadership that influenced teachers� work motivation were teamwork, digital literacy, and creative thinking, which jointly accounted for 47.90% of the variance. The key predictive variables included teamwork, the ability to adapt through digital literacy, and creative thinking.Predictive equation in raw scores ? 1.918 + .021 (X1) +.346 (X2) ** + .106 (X3) ** + .150 (X4) ** - .017(X5) Predictive equation in standardized scores ??.025 (X1) + .594 (X2) ** + .157 (X3) ** + .238 (X4) ** + -.033 (X5) Keyword : Creative Leadership, Teachers� Work Motivation, Motivation | - |
| dc.description.abstract | ??????? : ??????????????????????? , ???????????????????????? , ???????? | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://kb.psu.ac.th/handle/2025/20223 | - |
| dc.language.iso | th | - |
| dc.publisher | Prince of Songkla University | - |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Thailand | - |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/th/ | - |
| dc.subject | ??????????????????????? | - |
| dc.subject | ???????????????????????? | - |
| dc.title | ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? 1 | - |
| dc.title.alternative | ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? 1 | - |
| dc.type | Minor Thesis | - |
Files
Files
Collections


