การประเมินผลลัพธ์ทางสังคมและการพัฒนาตัวชี้วัดของผลตอบแทนทางสังคมจากการลงทุนสำหรับค่ายปรับเปลี่ยนพฤติกรรมผู้เสพยาเสพติดต้นแบบ (มาตรฐานใหม่) : กรณีศึกษา จังหวัดสตูล

Abstract

This research is a descriptive research using both quantitative and qualitative data collection. The study was to social outcomes assessment and find out indicators of Social Returns on Investment in terms of quantity and finance for the standard of behavioral modification drug camp: a case study of Satun province, which was first held in the 2015. The data was collected from 4 sample groups are: 1) 123 The rehabilitated persons 2) 41 Family of rehabilitated persons 3) 31 Community leaders who underwent the rehabilitation, and 4) 4 staffs of Center Against Drugs Satun Province. The data collection was conducted during January to May 2018, using the structured interview. Which was assessed the quality and validity by 4 experts. Then the instrument was analyzed by using the Item Objective Congruence Index (IOC = 0.5-1.00). After collecting data, the data was analyzed utilizing descriptive statistics and content analysis. The results revealed that the social outcomes of the rehabilitated persons were: 1) quitting drugs and having good health both physically and mentally, 2) living well with their families and communities, and 3) having careers to take care of themselves and their families including receiving fair treatments from their employers. The social outcomes of rehabilitated persons were 1) receiving more attention and 2) creating careers for their families by supporting them. The social outcomes of the community were 1) result of cooperation due to operation and 2) receiving important labors for development. The indicators of the social outcomes on investment in drug camp were that the rehabilitated persons were able to quit drugs and healthy both body and mind. For the quantitative indicators, it was indicated that the rehabilitated persons who had a status of service recipient became a non-drug user. 2) Those had been physically and mentally normal, and the financial indicators were 1) costs of rehabilitation therapy and 2) costs of reduced drug purchase. The rehabilitated persons could live together with their families and communities. The quantitative indicator was that they were accepted from their families and communities, and the financial indicator was labor cost. They had careers to take care of themselves and their families including receiving fair treatments from their employers. The quantitative indicator was that the rehabilitated persons had careers, and the financial indicator was labor cost. Their families were more attentive. The quantitative indicator was that their families accepted them, and the financial indicator was labor cost that created careers for their families. The quantitative indicator was that the rehabilitated persons and their families had careers to reduce cost and increase income from professionally supports, and the financial indicator was income from the supported careers. It was the cooperation from their operation. The quantitative indicator was projects resulting of the cooperation due to the operation, and the financial indicator was spent budget of the projects. Moreover, it was found that the projects had the essential labors for developing community. The quantity indicators of getting labor for community development were that people 1) who underwent rehabilitation therapy helped or had activities with the community; 2) they had careers. The financial indicator was labor cost. The value of social outcomes can estimated social returns on investments about 14.84 by using the developed indicators, which shows in the 1 baht investment of the standard of behavioral modification drug camp at Satun province can generate social results approximately 14.84 bah. It can be used to make recommendations on the operating budget policy of drug camp in order to show the social and financial results from the operations distinctly.