ระเบียบวิธีการอรรถาธิบายอัลกุรอานโดยอิหม่ามอัลบะเฆาะวีย์และอิหม่ามอิบนุอาดิละ:กรณีศึกษาเปรียบเทียบสูเราะฮอัลบะเกาะเราะหฺ

Abstract

t The study aims to define new scientific concepts after identifying points of similarities and differences between the methodology of Imam al-Baghawl and Imam ibn Adel al-Dimashqi within Surat al-Baqarah, through the comparative method and the analytical, descriptive, and inductive approach Sonia The research came with results that showed that Imam Al-Baghawi and Imam ibn Adel Al-Dimashqi were the first among the scholars of interpretation, and their interpretation of the Ma-alimutanzil and Allubab fi ilmukitab were satisfied and accepted among scholars. The features of Ma-alimutanzil was characterized by commetary by evidence, and Allubab, which combined exegesis with evidence and exegesis opinion, and the two imams agreed not to override the interpretation by opinion when there is narration evidence, and if there is no correct narration, then they go to opinion, and the difference between them is that Imam Al-Baghawi does not It expands as does Imam Ibn Adel al-Dimashqi The two Imams also dealt with the investigations in the sciences of the Qur'an and cosmic verses, as well as the two imams dealt with language, rhetoric, and quoting the sayings of the Arabs, and exposure to jurisprudential rulings and mentioning the sayings of the Imams without fanaticism, and both of them defended the belief of the Sunnis and the community and refuted the sayings of innovators and the stray differences and the difference between them that Imam Al-Baghawi followed the approach of the people of the ancestors in the verses of adjectives and Imam Ibn Adel al-Dimashqi proceeded to the contrary.